TruthMovement an internet research-guide for students and scholars. Best viewed in Chrome Browser

Blog Search

Friday, May 27, 2016

STUDENT VICTIMS OR STUDENT CRIMINALS? THE BOOKENDS OF SEXTING IN A CYBER WORLD ToddA. DeMitchell* Martha Parker-Magagn

STUDENT VICTIMS OR STUDENT CRIMINALS? THE BOOKENDS OF SEXTING IN A CYBER WORLD ToddA. DeMitchell Martha Parker-Magagn

THE BIG SECRET THAT MAKES THE FBI’S ANTI-ENCRYPTION CAMPAIGN A BIG LIE Jenna McLaughlin

THE BIG SECRET THAT MAKES THE FBI’S ANTI-ENCRYPTION CAMPAIGN A BIG LIE Jenna McLaughlin

The Difference between Electronic and Paper Documents

The Difference between Electronic and Paper Documents

Law Prof Writing Revenge Porn Legislation Wants To Upend Safe Harbors On The Internet 'For The Children' M. Franks

Law Prof Writing Revenge Porn Legislation Wants To Upend Safe Harbors On The Internet 'For The Children' M. Franks

Paedophilia and Cognitive Dissonance by Jonathan MS Pearce

Paedophilia and Cognitive Dissonance by Jonathan MS Pearce

UNITED STATES V. ROY WILSON

UNITED STATES V. ROY WILSON



FEDERAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PROSECUTIONS UNFAIR? John T. Floyd

FEDERAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PROSECUTIONS UNFAIR? John T. Floyd

PARDUE V. JACKSON CNTY. Share Save PDF Keith Starrett UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PARDUE V. JACKSON CNTY. Share Save PDF Keith Starrett UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER






UNITED STATES V. D.M. Jack B. Weinstein SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, HEARING AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge

UNITED STATES V. D.M. Jack B. Weinstein SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, HEARING AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge

“Indicating that mandatory-minimum sentences for child pornography offenses "will cause serious and unnecessary harm to adolescent defendants by applying a mechanical and unnecessarily harsh sentencing scheme to address the broad range of culpability and circumstances involved in child pornography"”

4After examining the statute and dictionary definitions of the material term “distribute” the court interprets the statute to require both
1) an active intention to give or transfer a specific visual depiction to another person and
2) active participation in the actual delivery.

2See, e.g., L. Jill Rettinger, The Relationship between Child Pornography and the commission of Sexual Offenses Against Children: A Review of the Literature 2–4 (2000) (noting limitation of anecdotal studies of convicted offenders); Note, Inequitable Sentencing for Possession of Child Pornography: A Failure to Distinguish Voyeurs from Pederasts, 61 Hastings L.J. 1282, 1294–98 (2010) (discussing methodological flaws of both types of studies); see also, e.g. United States v. Johnson, 588 F.Supp.2d 997 (S.D.Iowa 2008) (systematically dismantling Butner Study); Taylor & Quayle, supra, at 26–27 (describing Lanning Report 1st ed. (1992) as “lacking empirical validation”); see also, e.g., Julian Sher & Benedict Carey, Debate on Child Pornography's Link to Molesting, N.Y. Times, July 19, 2007, http:// www. nytimes. com/ 2007/ 07/ 19/ us/ 19 sex. html (noting controversy surrounding Butner Study).

UNITED STATES V. BENNETT by Myron H. Thompson MEMORANDUM OPINION


UNITED STATES V. BENNETT by Myron H. Thompson MEMORANDUM OPINION


“Discussing judicial discontent over mandatory-minimum-sentencing schemes and noting, among other things, that in a recent survey conducted by the United States Sentencing Commission, 62 % of federal judges reported that the sentences they were required to impose were generally too high across-the-board”















UNITED STATES V. INMAN by Gregory F. Van Tatenhove

UNITED STATES V. INMAN MEMORANDUM OPINION & RE-SENTENCING ORDER

“Discussing disputed research pertaining to relationship between viewing child pornography and committing sexual abuse”

UNITED STATES V. CRISMAN

UNITED STATES V. CRISMAN
“Discussing disputed research pertaining to relationship between viewing child pornography and committing sexual abuse”