Sunday, November 1, 2015
images downloaded over P2P for FREE reflects the speed and quality of an individual's Internet connection rather than the effort they expended to painstakingly build a collection over years possibly decades.
Prior to the Internet, a large CP collection of hundreds or even thousands of images would have been indicative of an enthusiast of very long standing, somebody who devoted much time, effort and money to amassing their collection, but the Internet has allowed individuals to download huge amounts of material intentionally or not locally or internationally in a very short space of time for FREE. In other words, a collection of 5,000 images downloaded over P2P for FREE reflects the speed and quality of an individual's Internet connection rather than the effort they expended to painstakingly build a collection over years possibly decades. How can they pass judgment on a person that downloaded CP via person to person(P2P) software because they were CURIOUS as if they were CP enthusiast of long-standing? This is important CSACI come not from third parties but from bestial fathers and mothers of the children that do this to them. Most are fathers with incestuous tendencies who meet in forums and chats not some P2P downloader.
Heroin related overdose deaths of CHILDREN have quadrupled since 2002 into the thousands so what is our law enforcement organizations doing to curb this devastation ?? They are going after CP of course !! How many children have died from taking pictures of themselves naked which today just happen to be the majority of CP online ? 0... Kids themselves are making the images without any "adult coercion", and NOTHING short of passing yet another law preventing those under 18 from carrying and using a device with a camera. Until that time a child's hormones in combination with a smartphone has KIDS taking naked pictures of themselves and posting those images ONLINE. What role do parents play and why is the government doing their job???? Its sad that the media is prevented from seeing the images because they could REPORT to the public exactly what kind of data IMAGES (images that hold no form or life) investigators were talking about.
Remember Traci Lords she first became known for her underage appearances in pornographic films. Tracy initially landed a job as a nude model at the age of 15 and then ventured into adult films so to say individuals such as these are in need of protection is beyond pale. A problem exists with definition and the use of pre internet vernacular and nomenclature. Today CP is pornography made by children. Adult Pornography is pornography made by adults. Adults who have sex with children and record that abuse with images are called images of abuse and crime scene evidence(CACSI). See the real danger is the public's extremely flawed understanding of the problem. "To prevent these crimes, we need accurate information about their true dynamics," said Janis Wolak, a lead child sexaul abuse researcher who also states, "The things that we hear and fear and the things that actually occur may not be the same.".
What about two kids that record their sexual trysts? That is now deemed to be CP? How about kids sexting is that CP? The scope of CP law is wide and overreaching also the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity did you know that? What about images from another country where the legal age is 16 or less; is that child porn?