TruthMovement an internet research-guide for students and scholars. Best viewed in Chrome Browser

Blog Search

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison




Although a man who was 32 wasn’t breaking the law by having sex with a 17-year-old girl in 2008, he was by photographing the act, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled Thursday.


Marshall Hollins was convicted in Stephenson County of making child pornography and sentenced to 8 years in prison.

Is this not sad? It brings me to tears.

A good black man’s life destroyed, a girl’s boy friend taken away. All to protect her from "abuse". 

Where is Al Sharpton?

Where is President Barack Obama. I know, if he had a son, it would be a street fighting thug like Trayvon Martin. Where are men’s rights activists?

Where are the feminists, for the girl’s rights to have a boy friend, and to have her pictures taken?


He admitted he had sex with the girl when she was 17, which is the age of sexual consent in Illinois.


In a 5-2 ruling, the high court said that although the law allows 17-year-olds to consent to sex, they are still minors, making photos or video of such sex child porn.

This is nothing new:


The two dissenting justices said that because the photos don’t show an illegal act, they shouldn’t be illegal.

The dissenting minority has a bit of decency and common sense.


‘There was nothing unlawful about the production of the photographs taken by defendant in this case because the sexual conduct between defendant and (the girl) was entirely legal,’ wrote Justice Anne Burke, who was joined by Justice Charles Freeman.


‘The photographs are therefore not child pornography as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court for purposes of the First Amendment.

Due to voodoo theory and falsified research about the child sex trauma myth(Rind Study), the US supreme court made an EXCEPTION to constitutional rights of the First Amendment.

In the above case, no "*child" has been harmed through an illegal act, so there should be no reason to make an exception to constitutional first amendment rights.
Millions of children watch child porn daily: whenever they look into the mirror, whenever they look at their private parts, they see heinous child porn. It just does not make sense. See also Dr. Milton Diamond‘s research and Judge Weinstein on the harms of child porn laws.


Photos and videos of child pornography on the Web have multiplied at an alarming rate over the past few years. In 2011, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children said it received 17.3 million images and videos of suspected child abuse, which is four times more than 2007. 
Human-Stupidity comment: It is impossible to verify this because it is a felony to look at any of these photos




The modifications will prevent more than 100,000 search terms from generating results that link to images and videos associated with child sex abuse and instead trigger a warning that the associated content is illegal. The restrictions, which apply to English-speaking countries, will be expanded to more than 150 languages in the next six months, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt wrote in an article for the … Read more


Children depicted in these images and videos are victimized during the production and throughout their lives, as the images proliferate and continue to be viewed, often for many years

You can enlist in the army at 17 (with parental permission), but you can’t understand the consequences of risque photographs until you’re 18. As for understanding what it is to have a Coors Light, well, you have to wait until you’re 21 for that.
More weird Sex News:
Warning: Child Porn photos in the Daily Mail link

It might be unsafe to click in the following link to a Daily Mail article. It contains photos 6 year old girls that appear to be naked.


Upon announcing the suggestive routine – ‘the audience should think that you are nude’, reveals Ms Miler – the show’s infamously competitive moms and their daughters are clearly shocked, as shown in the preview at Jezebel.
More hysterical lies:

Share with your friend, if you like it, or if you hate it.

This entry was posted by admin on January 16, 2014 at 12:07 am under Child Porn Witch Hunt. Tagged child porn victims, child pornography, freedom of expression, law, Marshall Hollins, men's rights, Teenage Sexuality, witch hunt. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.


Google Announces Building a Database of Child Porn

Google Announces Building a Database of Child Porn
Google Announces Building a Database of Child Porn




Pornographic Protections? Itineraries of Childhood Innocence Joseph J. Fischel


Pornographic Protections? Itineraries of Childhood Innocence Joseph J. Fischel






OPERATION (pick any name) like operation predator whatever

OPERATION (pick any name) like operation predator whatever

Ex-Walworth prosecutor faces child porn-related charges By Scott Waltmans


Ex-Walworth prosecutor faces child porn-related charges
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:24 am | Updated: 5:49 pm, Wed Aug 13, 2014.
Ex-Walworth prosecutor faces child porn-related charges By Scott Waltmanswaltman@aberdeennews.com Aberdeen News Co. |
A former Walworth County prosecuting attorney accused of child rape in Hughes County faces federal charges of sexual exploitation of a child and distribution of material involving sexual exploitation of minors, according to court paperwork.


Christopher R. Jansen, 34, of Selby, appeared in court on the federal charges this week.


According to the documents related to the federal charges, a search warrant was executed on Jansen's residence on July 29 during which "computer media that contained child pornography, images and videos" was found.


Jansen was interviewed by authorities that day, according to the documents. And, according to that paperwork, Jansen told them that:


• Since since December 2013, he has been a member of a website that distributes pornography.


• He has exchanged with other members of the website matters that contain child pornography.


• He produced videos involving two minors engaged in sexually explicit acts.


• He engaged in sexual acts with three boys from Hughes County and that he had a professional relationship with the boys' family.


• Some of the sexual acts with two of the boys were recorded on video.


• Videos involving one of the boys was shared on the Internet.


• He is a pedophile, who has been attracted to children since he was 10 or 12 years old.


• He molests minors when he can't control his compulsions.


• "There is no cure for his attraction to minors."


Jansen's boyfriend also told investigators that Jensen has an attraction to juvenile boys and that he would view child pornography to satisfy his desires. One of the minor victims told investigators that the improper acts took place at his Hughes County home.


The federal sexual exploitation of a child charge is a felony with a minimum sentence of 15 years in prison and a maximum sentence of 30 years and a fine of up to $250,000. The distribution of material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor charge is a felony that has a minimum sentence of five years in prison and a maximum sentence of 20 years and a fine of up to $250,000.


Jansen is in custody, but his next court date on the federal charges has not yet been set, according to documents in the case.


In Hughes County, he faces three state counts of rape involving a child. He faces a maximum sentence of life in prison on each count, and his next court date is slated for Aug. 26 in Pierre.


Jansen worked as state's attorney in Walworth County from 2009 through 2012. Before his arrest, he was also indigent defense work in Brown County.


Follow @ScottReports on Twitter.

FBI seizes child porn website then RUNS it for two weeks distributing images of children being abused to thousands of pedophiles as part of investigation, By Helen Pow

FBI seizes child porn website then RUNS it for two weeks distributing images of children being abused to thousands of pedophiles as part of investigation, By Helen Pow